0:00
/

EP 13 Brad Thor and Ward Larson -- Cold Zero

In conversations with Ward Larsen and Brad Thor, the authors of Cold Zero pull back the curtain on collaboration, craft, Arctic suspense, and why this high-concept thriller already feels built for the

Cold Zero Is the Rare Co-Written Thriller That Never Misses a Beat

There are co-written thrillers that feel assembled, and then there are co-written thrillers that feel forged.

Cold Zero, the new collaboration between Ward Larsen and Brad Thor, belongs firmly in the second category.

That is not faint praise. I have long been skeptical of co-written thrillers. Too often, the seams show. The voice shifts. The pacing gets uneven. The machinery of the collaboration becomes visible on the page. But Cold Zero does something rare. It reads with the confidence, precision, and momentum of a novel written by one author at the top of his game.

That was my impression before I spoke with Larsen and Thor. It was only reinforced afterward.

What emerged from both conversations was a revealing look at how this novel came together, why it works, and why this book already feels built for the screen.

“The more we got into it, the more we realized how little difference there was in kind of the way we wrote and the way we approached our writing.”
— Ward Larsen

That explains a great deal.

One of the striking things about Cold Zero is that it never reads like a stitched-together enterprise. It does not feel like alternating chapters from two different sensibilities. It feels unified. Fluid. Controlled. Larsen told me that as the process developed, he and Thor discovered just how naturally their styles aligned.

“One of us would write some chapters and send it to the other, and the other one would edit it, and we just kind of went back and forth like that.”
— Ward Larsen

Simple in theory. Difficult in practice.

Anybody who has ever done serious writing understands that collaboration at that level is not easy. A novel is not a memo. It is not a policy draft. It is voice, cadence, instinct, structure, tension, and imagination all working together at once. Yet Larsen and Thor seem to have found a process that respected both the work and each other.

Larsen explained that the two worked in chunks, mapping out several chapters at a time, writing, editing, exchanging, and then moving forward again. Over time, what might have begun as an experiment became rhythm.

And rhythm matters in a thriller.

Cold Zero moves. And like a bomb cyclone delivers bone chilling drama.

That is one of its greatest strengths. The book opens like a force of nature — kinetic energy enervating crafted prose — and it never really lets off the accelerator. But it also avoids one of the traps that can plague high-concept thrillers: drowning the reader in technical exposition merely to prove the authors did their homework.

There is technical credibility here, certainly. But it is disciplined. It serves the story rather than smothering it.

“You have to strike a balance… You don’t want to drop anybody out. You don’t want to bore any readers. I tend towards the narrative.”
— Ward Larsen

That instinct serves the book well. Larsen, with his aviation background, brings obvious authority to the material, especially when the conversation turns to aircraft systems, vulnerabilities, and the plausibility of the novel’s central scenario. But even then, he does not descend into the weeds for their own sake. He keeps his eye on the same thing the reader cares about: tension.

And there is plenty of it.

The premise is exactly the sort of idea that thriller readers love because it feels both cinematic and uncomfortably plausible: a commercial aircraft traversing the Arctic goes down with highly sensitive technology aboard, triggering a race involving U.S., Russian, and Chinese interests to recover it first.

It is a big idea. But it is grounded in a simple question.

“I’ve been fascinated with the fact that so many commercial airliners go over the North Pole to save time and fuel. And we’ve never lost one. And I thought, what if one went down up there?”
— Brad Thor

That is the question at the heart of Cold Zero, and it is a very good one.

Thor told me the idea had been with him for years. What makes it work, however, is not just the concept. It is the execution. The Arctic setting, the race to recover sensitive AI technology, the geopolitical stakes, the pressure of time, and the vulnerability of modern systems all converge in a way that feels urgent without feeling overwrought.

Larsen was especially interesting on the issue of technological compromise. He noted that aviation manufacturers have every incentive to protect aircraft systems from intrusion, but also acknowledged the basic reality that modern technology carries vulnerabilities and that writers have a duty to think seriously about them.

“If I can think of this, so can the bad guys. And we need to keep up our guard.”
— Ward Larsen

That line captures something essential about the best thriller fiction — the genre is not prophecy; it is stress-testing. It is the imaginative exercise of asking where the weak points are before somebody with malign intent finds them first.

Thor, for his part, spoke less like an engineer and more like a dramatist, which is exactly what gives Cold Zero its propulsion. He described a philosophy of writing that is built around avoiding the obvious and surprising the reader.

“Take the first four things that come into your head and throw them out.”
— Brad Thor

That is terrific advice, and it shows in the novel. The plot does not simply advance. It twists, redirects, and tightens. Thor clearly understands that modern thriller readers are sophisticated. They have read a lot. They see standard moves coming. So the writer must think beyond the first solution, beyond the most obvious turn, and beyond the easiest escape route.

That requires real craft. It also requires stress.

“Easy reading is damn hard writing.”
— Brad Thor

That may be the single best line in either interview, because it is exactly right.

Cold Zero reads effortlessly, but that ease is hard-won. It is the product of two disciplined professionals doing the invisible labor that keeps the reader from ever feeling the labor. The pages turn quickly not because the book is thin, but because the writing is efficient. Clean. Purposeful. Built to carry the reader forward.

Another point of interest from both interviews was that neither Thor nor Larsen is an outliner in the rigid sense. Both described themselves as “pantsers,” seat-of-the-pants writers who discover parts of the story in the act of writing it.

That can be dangerous in lesser hands. Here, it seems to have generated energy.

“By being a seat-of-the-pants writer, you are putting yourself in the reader’s position.”
— Ward Larsen

That is a perceptive point. The sense of discovery in Cold Zero feels authentic because, in important respects, it was authentic. The authors were not merely executing a preloaded blueprint. They were solving the story as they went, which may be one reason the book feels so alive.

Thor also offered a useful metaphor for how he thinks about his work. He compared his writing career to an amusement park, with each Scott Harvath novel functioning as a new roller coaster. A co-written book, then, had to meet the same standard as the rides he builds on his own.

“It had to be as good as the stuff I write on my own.”
— Brad Thor

That was the standard, and Cold Zero clears it.

Thor also gave insight into why a writer with an established and successful solo franchise would want to co-author a novel in the first place. Part of it is practical. Readers always want the next book sooner. Part of it is creative. Not every strong idea fits an existing protagonist or series framework. And part of it, plainly, is that collaboration can inject fresh energy into what is otherwise a very solitary profession.

That energy comes through in Cold Zero. Both men seemed to genuinely enjoy writing it.

“We really had a good time writing this book.”
— Ward Larsen

“Every experience… was good. It was positive.”
— Brad Thor

That joy matters. Readers can tell when a book has been written mechanically, out of obligation, or under the dead weight of formula. Cold Zero does not feel like that. It feels sharp. It feels engaged. It feels like two veteran writers pushing each other in useful ways.

And then there is the Hollywood angle.

Thor confirmed that Cold Zero has been picked up by Netflix as a feature film, not a series. He said producer-director Pete Berg is attached, with True Detective creator Nick Pizzolatto writing the screenplay. That is a serious combination of names, and it is easy to understand why the novel attracted that kind of interest.

The story is cinematic by nature. But more importantly, it has the structural integrity to support adaptation. This is not just a flashy premise. It is a well-built thriller with enough tension, atmosphere, and technical credibility to sustain a film if the adaptation stays true to the story’s core.

Thor made clear that he and Larsen will not be writing the screenplay, but they do expect to be available for technical consultation where useful. That sounds right. A film adaptation will necessarily become its own thing. But the details still matter, especially in material like this, where logistics, signals, systems, and decision chains help create the sense that what you are watching could happen.

In the end, what most impressed me in these conversations was not merely the professionalism of both men, though there is plenty of that. It was the seriousness with which they approached entertainment.

That may sound paradoxical, but it is not.

Readers today have no shortage of distractions. A book has to justify its claim on your time. It has to earn your attention. Cold Zero does. It is worth the investment. It is worth the hours. And for readers who, like me, have sometimes approached co-written thrillers with caution, it may do something even more significant.

It may restore your faith.

If you enjoy smart, fast-moving thrillers with geopolitical stakes, technological tension, and a narrative that never loses altitude, Cold Zero deserves a place on your list.

And after speaking with both Ward Larsen and Brad Thor, I am even more convinced that this is only the beginning of what could become a very productive collaboration.

Listen to the episode for the full conversations with Ward Larsen and Brad Thor, where we discuss the origins of Cold Zero, the realities of co-writing, AI and modern thriller fiction, the coming Netflix adaptation, and why this book works as well as it does.

Don’t miss my full review coming to Townhall soon!

Thanks for reading First Draft! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Social Media

If you enjoyed this conversation with Brad Thor and Ward Larsen, you can follow our work and stay updated on future interviews, book discussions, and thriller recommendations through the following platforms.

John Nantz

Follow John Nantz for interviews with leading thriller authors, national security commentary, and writing on books, culture, and current events.

X: https://x.com/thejohnnantz
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnnantz
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thejohnnantz
Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@thejohnnantz
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thejohnnantz


Brad Thor

Brad Thor is the #1 New York Times bestselling author of the Scott Harvath thriller series and co-author of Cold Zero.

Website:

https://bradthor.com

X: https://x.com/BradThor
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bradthor
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BradThor


Ward Larsen

Ward Larsen is a bestselling thriller author and former U.S. Air Force fighter pilot who flew the A-10 Warthog. He is the creator of the popular David Slaton espionage series and co-author of Cold Zero.

Website: https://wardlarsen.com
X: https://x.com/WardLarsen
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WardLarsenAuthor


Buy Cold Zero

You can purchase Cold Zero here:

Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1668002215

Discussion about this video

User's avatar

Ready for more?